Kerugian Negara dan Risiko Bisnis dalam Pengelolaan BUMN Energi: Telaah atas Business Judgment Rule dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia


Date Published : 2 February 2025

Contributors

Bisman Bhaktiar

Author

Keywords

Business Judgment Rule state losses business risk energy State-Owned Enterprises legal protection.

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Proceedings UHAMKA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The oil and gas industry is a high-risk and high-capital sector in which business losses are inherent to corporate activities. However, in Indonesia, business losses in StateOwned Enterprises, particularly in the energy sector, are often associated with state financial losses and criminal liability. This condition creates legal uncertainty for
directors and management in making strategic business decisions, especially due to the tendency of law enforcement to apply a result-based approach rather than a process-based approach.This study examines the relationship between state losses and business risks in
the management of energy State-Owned Enterprises through the perspective of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) within the Indonesian legal system. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The study finds that although BJR has been partially recognized in Indonesian
regulations, its implementation remains ineffective due to regulatory disharmony and inconsistent interpretation of state losses. Therefore, stronger and more explicit regulation regarding BJR is necessary to provide legal certainty, prevent the criminalization of business decisions, and create a balance between legal protection and accountability in the management of energy State-Owned Enterprises.

References

Bainbridge, Stephen M. “The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine.”
Vanderbilt Law Review. Vol. 57. No. 1 (2004).
“Controller Confusion: Realigning Controlling Stockholders and Controlled
Boards.” Harvard Law Review. Vol. 133. No. 5 (2020).
Gevurtz, Franklin A. “The Business Judgment Rule: Meaningless Verbiage or
Misguided Notion?” Southern California Law Review. Vol. 67 (1994).
Gold, Andrew S. “A Decision Theory Approach to the Business Judgment Rule:
Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, and Judicial Uncertainty.” Maryland Law
Review. Vol. 66. No. 2 (2007).
Johnson, Lyman P. Q. “Unsettledness in Delaware Corporate Law: Business
Judgment Rule, Corporate Purpose.” Delaware Journal of Corporate Law.
Vol. 38 (2013).
Mantese, Gerard V., dan Philip G. Louis Jr. “The Verdict on the Business Judgment
Rule.” Journal of the Missouri Bar. Vol. 76. No. 2 (2020).
McMillan, Lori. “The Business Judgment Rule as an Immunity Doctrine.” William
& Mary Business Law Review. Vol. 4. No. 2 (2013).
Nimmerfall, Paul, dan Lukas Josef Peissl. “The Business Judgment Rule and its
Impact on Austrian Law.” Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. Vol. 23. No. 4
(2015).

Downloads

How to Cite

Bisman Bhaktiar, B. B. (2025, February 2). Kerugian Negara dan Risiko Bisnis dalam Pengelolaan BUMN Energi: Telaah atas Business Judgment Rule dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Proceedings UHAMKA. https://conferences.uhamka.ac.id/uhamka/paper/view/276