Construction of Corporate Public Relations Messages in Divestment Communication: Framing Analysis of the Divestment of Admedika by PT Telkom Indonesia (PERSERO) TBK
Contributors
Zulfahmi Yasir Yunan, Gilang Kumari Putra
Keywords
Proceeding
Track
General Track
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Proceedings UHAMKA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Divestment is a form of corporate action that not only has financial implications but also significant communication
consequences for various stakeholders. On June 2, 2026, PT Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk completed the
divestment process of PT Administrasi Medika (AdMedika) and its subsidiary TelkoMedika to Fullerton Health
Singapore through a 100% ownership release scheme worth IDR 751 billion. This event is interesting because it
took place in the context of the restructuring of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) mandated by Danantara and the
demands for transparency of public companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the New York Stock
Exchange. This study aims to analyze the construction of Telkom's corporate public relations message in
communicating the AdMedika divestment to the public across temporal phases. The study uses a constructivist
paradigm with a qualitative approach and the Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) method. Data were obtained from
press releases, information disclosure to the Financial Services Authority (OJK), statements by Telkom officials in
the mass media, and corporate communication documents published throughout the period of June 2025–June
2026. The analysis was conducted using Robert N. Entman's (1993) framing model, which includes four elements:
define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgments, and treatment recommendations, and supplemented
with elements of Image Repair Theory (Benoit, 2015) and Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003). The results
show that Telkom framed the divestment not as an asset disposal, but as part of the company's strategic
transformation towards a Strategic Holding position. The dominant framing emphasized portfolio optimization, a
focus on core digital and connectivity businesses, long-term value creation, and strengthening global
competitiveness. The study found a structural invisibilization of external factors triggering the divestment,
particularly the Danantara restructuring mandate, as well as a significant absence of narratives about the impact on
employees and service users. These findings suggest that divestment communication functions as both an
instrument of organizational legitimacy and a perception management mechanism that consciously manages the
boundaries between disclosed and withheld information.